1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 307 F.2d
  5. 307 F.2d 104 (1962)
 

LUNDGREN v. FREEMAN

No. 17232.

307 F.2d 104 (1962)

James LUNDGREN, dba Pacific Construction Company, Appellant, v. Claude FREEMAN, Sydney B. Hayslip and Stewart Tuft, Co-partners, dba Freeman, Hayslip and Tuft, Appellees. SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 5, Appellant, v. James LUNDGREN, dba Pacific Construction Company, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

June 27, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Reinhardt, Coblens & Stoll and Justin N. Reinhardt, Portland, Or., for appellant Lundgren.

Banta, Silven, Horton & Young and David C. Silven, Baker, Or., for appellant School Dist. No. 5.

Koerner, Young, McColloch & Dezendorf, Oglesby H. Young, and James H. Clarke, Portland, Or., for appellees.

Before JERTBERG, KOELSCH and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.

DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge.

Lundgren, a building contractor, appeals from an order and a summary judgment, and School District No. 5 of Baker, Oregon, ("school district") appeals from two judgments, in an action brought by Lundgren against school district and the architectural firm of Freeman, Hayslip and Tuft ("architects"). We are affirming as to all matters appealed, except the time as of which interest is allowed, and the summary judgment in favor of architects. As...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases