1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 200 Cal.App.2d
  5. 200 Cal.App.2d 199 (1962)
 

RASH v. CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Docket No. 19620.

200 Cal.App.2d 199 (1962)

19 Cal. Rptr. 266

WILLIAM F. RASH, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

February 13, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ernest H. Norback for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Dion R. Holm, City Attorney, and Donald J. Garibaldi, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendants and Respondents.

TOBRINER, J.

In a day when the use of the motor vehicle is almost universal and the knowledge of its propensities is common, we are constrained to hold that the trial court should have admitted the testimony of two witnesses who would have described the speed of a municipal bus; we believe the exclusion of the testimony constituted prejudicial error. We have also decided that the testimony of one of the physicians who treated appellant should likewise have been admitted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases