RADMACHER v. CARDINAL

No. 38,398.

264 Minn. 72 (1962)

117 N.W. (2d) 738

RUDOLPH RADMACHER v. JAMES CARDINAL. BENJAMIN CHESIN, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

October 26, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Faegre & Benson, Raymond Scallen, and Wright Brooks, for appellant.

Freeman, Hoppe & Kennedy and Robert J. Healy, for respondent.


OTIS, JUSTICE.

Appeal from an order of the district court striking from the answer of appellant, third-party defendant, Benjamin Chesin, allegations of estoppel by verdict arising out of a cross-suit for contribution brought by respondent, third-party plaintiff, James Cardinal.

This litigation arises out of a collision between a car driven by Chesin in which plaintiff, Rudolph Radmacher, was a passenger, and a car driven by Cardinal. In a previous action Chesin...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases