1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 204 F.Supp.
  5. 204 F.Supp. 39 (1962)
 

TURBO MACHINE COMPANY v. PROCTOR & SCHWARTZ, INC.

Civ. A. No. 31156.

204 F.Supp. 39 (1962)

TURBO MACHINE COMPANY and Alba-Waldensian, Inc. v. PROCTOR & SCHWARTZ, INC., and Proctor Hydro-Set Company.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

April 25, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert B. Frailey and Henry N. Paul, Jr., of Paul & Paul, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs.

Charles H. Howson, Jr., of Howson & Howson, Dexter N. Shaw, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendants.

FREEDMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Turbo Machine Company, brought suit against Proctor & Schwartz, Inc., for a declaratory judgment that the manufacture, sale and use of its dye-boarding machines for the finishing of ladies' hosiery does not infringe the defendant's patent. Turbo is a Pennsylvania corporation and its principal place of business is at Lansdale, Pennsylvania. Proctor & Schwartz is a Pennsylvania corporation and its principal place of business...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases