LOOMAN REALTY CORP. v. BROAD ST. NAT. BK., TRENTON


74 N.J. Super. 71 (1962)

180 A.2d 524

LOOMAN REALTY CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE BROAD STREET NATIONAL BANK OF TRENTON, A NATIONAL BANKING CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND GREEN ROSE ASSOCIATES, INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW YORK, INTERVENING DEFENDANT. LOUIS GRAFF AND EMANUEL LERMAN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE BROAD STREET NATIONAL BANK OF TRENTON, A NATIONAL BANKING CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 19, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Nathan N. Schildkraut argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Kahn, Schildkraut & Levy, attorneys).

Mr. John J. Connell argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Wicoff & Lanning, attorneys).

Mr. Allan H. Klinger argued the cause for intervening defendant-respondent (Messrs. Milton, Augelli & Keane, attorneys).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FOLEY and BARRETT.


The opinion of the court was delivered by FOLEY, J.A.D.

Looman Realty Corporation, and Louis Graff and Emanuel Lerman, appeal from the dismissal of consolidated actions against defendant Broad Street National Bank of Trenton and intervening defendant Green Rose Associates, Inc., at the conclusion of a plenary hearing. The action was for specific performance of an alleged contract to sell the Broad Street Bank building...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases