JULIANO v. HOBART MANUFACTURING COMPANY

No. 5989.

303 F.2d 830 (1962)

Michael H. JULIANO, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. HOBART MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals First Circuit.

Decided June 15, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold E. Cole, Boston, Mass., for appellant.

Lawrence B. Biebel, Dayton, Ohio, with whom Dailey L. Bugg, Dayton, Ohio, Robert L. Meade, Boston, Mass., Marechal, Biebel, French & Bugg, Dayton, Ohio, and Hale & Dorr, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for appellee.

Before WOODBURY, Chief Judge, and HARTIGAN and ALDRICH, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, having made and sold to the public an attachment for defendant's machine, sold one to defendant, to which he now seeks to attach a confidential relationship. After the sale to defendant the plaintiff obtained a design patent on his device. Defendant presently manufactures an attachment which admittedly is so different that there is no infringement of plaintiff's design patent. The district court ordered summary judgment for the defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases