On this review of the revocation of petitioner's motor vehicle operator's license for refusal to take a blood test after arrest for driving while intoxicated, the petitioner argues that there is "no substantial, competent evidence * * * to support a finding that petitioner knowingly refused to submit to a chemical test", and that the finding of such a refusal is arbitrary and capricious. That petitioner refused to undergo a test after his arrest is abundantly established...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.