PER CURIAM.
In this case the appellant attempts to invoke the jurisdiction of this court because by motion to dismiss the constitutionality of Section 84.05(11) was assailed, and it is insisted that the question was also presented at the time the court considered the motion for summary final decree.
In his order on the motions to dismiss, the chancellor recited that the constitutionality of the law "was raised but the Court reserves ruling on this issue until...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
