SEITZ v. JONES

No. 38631.

370 P.2d 300 (1961)

Florence F. SEITZ, Plaintiff in Error, v. J. E. JONES and R. L. Detjen, Defendants in Error.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Rehearing Denied April 3, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hunt & Lock, by Richard W. Lock, Jay, for plaintiff in error.

Rhodes, Crowe, Hieronymus & Holloway, Philip N. Landa, Tulsa, for defendants in error.


WELCH, Justice.

The order of the trial court shows that demurrer was sustained because the petition showed on its face that the alleged cause of action stated did not accrue to the plaintiff within two years next before the commencement of the suit, and was therefore barred by the statute of limitations as provided in Title 12 O.S.A. § 95, subd. 3.

This action is based upon malpractice which allegedly occurred...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases