ROZE v. ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING PRODUCTS


12 Wis.2d 644 (1961)

ROZE, Respondent, v. ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC., Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

March 7, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Welsh, Trowbridge, Bills, Planert & Gould of Green Bay, and oral argument by Lloyd J. Planert.

For the respondent there was a brief by Everson, Whitney, O'Mella & Everson of Green Bay, and oral argument by James L. Everson.


BROADFOOT, J.

Like many other businessmen, the officers of the defendant did not reduce the terms of the profit-sharing plan to writing. There was no legal requirement that the terms of the plan and agreement with the plaintiff in connection therewith had to be in writing. However, as often happens in such cases, there was a dispute between the parties as to the terms of the plan and of the agreement entered into. Under such circumstances it is necessary that such...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases