In its opinion the court stated: "In placing a value on this property the Court has taken into consideration comparable sales, the awards made by the Court for other properties in the vicinity, the knowledge gained by hearing other claims and by viewing the property." Appellant contends that it was prejudicial error for the court to consider "the awards made by the Court for other properties in the vicinity". While this is really the same thing as saying the court in drawing...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
