VAN DUYNE v. CALDWELL MOTORS


71 N.J. Super. 518 (1961)

MARVIN VAN DUYNE, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. CALDWELL MOTORS, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 20, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Patrick J. Timmons argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Lewis P. Dolan, Jr., argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Dolan and Dolan, attorneys; Mr. William Martin Cox, on the brief).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FOLEY and MOLINEUX.


PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the County Court affirming the judgment entered in the Workmen's Compensation Division in favor of respondent because the Division did not have jurisdiction of the claim petition, is affirmed for the reasons stated by County Judge Mills. As he observed, the filing of a claim petition within the time prescribed by R.S. 34:15-51 is a jurisdictional requirement. Schwarz v. Federal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases