THOMPSON v. NEE


12 Wis.2d 326 (1961)

THOMPSON and another, Respondents, v. NEE and another, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

January 10, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Swingen, Stern & Lenahan and William E. Johnson, all of Madison, and oral argument by Mr. Johnson.

For the respondents there was a brief and oral argument by D. V. W. Beckwith of Madison.


BROWN, J.

The defendants do not contend that Mrs. Nee was not causally negligent but they assert that their requested question concerning causal negligence on the part of Mrs. Thompson should have been included in the verdict, and also a question comparing the causal negligence of Mrs. Thompson and Mrs. Nee. Defendants also submit that plaintiffs' witness, Dr. Suckle, was erroneously permitted to testify to subjective symptoms...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases