1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 35 N.J.
  5. 35 N.J. 270 (1961)
 

DOUGLAS v. HARRIS

35 N.J. 270 (1961)

173 A.2d 1

VIOLA DOUGLAS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CHARLES HARRIS AND MARY JOHNSON, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 30, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Howard T. Rosen argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Mr. Emanuel Needle, of counsel; Mr. Harold Friedman, on the brief).

Mr. Joseph E. Zavesky argued the cause for defendant-respondent Charles Harris (Messrs. Mead, Gleeson, Hansen & Pantages, attorneys; Mr. Joseph E. Zavesky, of counsel and on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by HANEMAN, J.

Plaintiff appealed to the Appellate Division from a judgment for defendant Charles Harris entered in the Law Division. The Appellate Division affirmed the Law Division, Douglas v. Harris, 63 N.J.Super. 313 (App. Div. 1960). Certification was granted by this court, 34 N.J. 64 (1961).

On March 24, 1957 plaintiff, a pedestrian...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases