PER CURIAM.
In this workmen's compensation case, petitioner appeals from the refusal to allow him an increase of compensation, over the award granted him in 1955.
The physical condition of petitioner's hands is no worse — indeed, apparently better — than in 1955. The theory upon which petitioner bases his demand for an increase of the award is that (a) his doctor did not know, or testify, in 1955 that he had become permanently sensitized to wood...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.