1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 71 N.J.
  5. 71 N.J. Super. 182 (1961)
 

BEADLING v. SIROTTA

71 N.J. Super. 182 (1961)

176 A.2d 546

GEORGE BEADLING, PLAINTIFF, v. E. BERNARD SIROTTA AND SAMUEL LANGSTON COMPANY, A N.J. CORP., DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided December 4, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For Motion — Messrs. Bleakly, Stockwell & Zink (by Mr. Charles McGeary), attorney for defendant Langston.

For Motion — Messrs. McCord, Farrell & Eynon (by Mr. Sidney P. McCord), attorney for defendant Sirotta.

Contra — Messrs. Dimon, Haines & Bunting (by Mr. Martin Haines), attorneys for plaintiff Beadling.

WOOD, J.C.C.

This case is before the court upon the separate motions of the defendants E. Bernard Sirotta and Samuel M. Langston Co., for summary judgment in their favor.

Plaintiff alleges that he made application to defendant Langston Company for a job; that his application was accepted and that he was sent to one Dr. Milnamow for examination; that Dr. Milnamow in turn referred plaintiff to defendant Dr. Sirotta...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases