DUNNIER v. DOOLITTLE


14 A.D.2d 179 (1961)

Arthur Dunnier, an Infant, by Arthur L. Dunnier, His Guardian ad Litem, et al., Appellants, v. Kenneth C. Doolittle, Doing Business under the Name of Laurel Bowlodrome, et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

August 1, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter N. Buono and John M. Rennell for appellants.

Smith & Sovik (Martin F. Kendrick of counsel), for Archam Kradjian and another, respondents.

Levene, Gouldin & Thompson (Carlton F. Thompson of counsel), for Kenneth C. Doolittle, respondent.

BERGAN, P. J., GIBSON, HERLIHY and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.


REYNOLDS, J.

At about 7:30 P.M. on September 24, 1957 infant appellant, then 13 years of age, and a friend gained access to the roof of the Laurel Bowlodrome in Binghamton some 15 to 18 feet above the ground by climbing an adjacent shed on property adjoining the bowling alley premises. While on the roof appellant noticed that a door leading to a room housing the ventilating exhaust fan for the bowling alley was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases