1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 14 A.D.2d
  5. 14 A.D.2d 4 (1961)
 

MATTER OF O'DOHERTY

14 A.D.2d 4 (1961)

In the Matter of Niall F. O'Doherty, an Attorney, Respondent. Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Petitioner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

July 13, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank H. Gordon of counsel (Eric Nightingale, attorney), for petitioner.

James W. Scott for respondent.

BREITEL, J. P., STEVENS, EAGER and STEUER concur in Per Curiam opinion; McNALLY, J., dissents in opinion.

Per Curiam.

This is a disciplinary proceeding instituted against an attorney and counselor at law, under section 90 of the Judiciary Law. Under original and supplemental petitions hearings were conducted by a Referee appointed by this court. With respect to the charges contained in the original petition the Referee found respondent guilty of "technical" conversions and with respect to the charges contained in the supplemental...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases