GOLDENBERG v. DAANE


13 Wis.2d 98 (1961)

GOLDENBERG, Respondent, v. DAANE and others, Appellants. WEBER, Respondent, v. SAME, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

March 7, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there were briefs by Schanen, Schanen & Pauly, attorneys, and Erwin N. Pauly and Walter J. Swietlik of counsel, all of Port Washington, and oral argument by Erwin N. Pauly.

For the respondent there was a brief by Goldenberg & McKay, attorneys, and Samuel Goldenberg of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Samuel Goldenberg and J. Curtis McKay.


FAIRCHILD, J.

1. Sufficiency of the form of the order. "No order granting a new trial in the interest of justice shall be valid or effective, unless the reasons that prompted the court to make such order are set forth in detail therein."1

The order in this case does not set forth reasons, but does recite the filing of a written decision "wherein the court sets forth its reasons for its decision that the motions of the plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases