CABAN v. BARTZON


13 A.D.2d 1024 (1961)

David Caban, an Infant, by His Guardian ad Litem, Brigida Caban, et al., Appellants, v. George Bartzon, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

June 26, 1961


Order affirmed, without costs.

The conditional denial of the preference may not be said to have been an improvident exercise of discretion in view of: (a) the lack of a definite statement as to which of the claimed injuries are permanent; (b) the lack of affidavits by either of the two treating physicians; and (c) the lack of a statement as to the mental and neurological condition of the infant plaintiff before the accident...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases