The Special Term held that the final order and determination in a prior summary proceeding were neither res judicata nor operated as a collateral estoppel preventing the respondent Charles Lutz from asserting title by adverse possession; that the weight and probative value of statements made by him in earlier litigation were matters for consideration by the trier of the facts; and that the character of his use of the premises and the hostility and the adversity of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
