1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.2d
  4. 21 Misc.2d
  5. 21 Misc.2d 938 (1960)
 

OPPENHEIM v. LONG IS. R.R. CO.

21 Misc.2d 938 (1960)

Raymond Oppenheim, an Infant, by His Guardian ad Litem, Anna Oppenheim, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Long Island Railroad Company, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Queens County.

January 5, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry F. Pine for plaintiffs.

Otto M. Buerger for defendant.

SAMUEL RABIN, J.

This is a motion pursuant to rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice to strike the "First Separate and Complete Defense" and the "Second Separate and Complete Defense" in defendant's answer on the ground that the matter contained therein is frivolous, irrelevant, redundant, unnecessary, impertinent, or scandalous and may tend to prejudice, embarrass or delay the fair trial of the action.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases