Docket No. L.A. 25715.

54 Cal.2d 33 (1960)

351 P.2d 344

4 Cal. Rptr. 176

McDOWELL AND CRAIG (a Corporation) et al., Petitioners, v. CITY OF SANTA FE SPRINGS et al., Respondents; TOM PAUL WETZEL, Appellant.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

April 19, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

No appearance for Petitioners.

Tiday, Pool & Moore and Ronald L. Tiday for Appellant.

Ferguson & Judge and James F. Judge for Respondents.


In this appeal from a judgment denying a writ of mandate and upholding the validity of an annexation of inhabited territory undertaken by respondent City of Santa Fe Springs, we have concluded that the trial court correctly resolved the issue of the time at which under pertinent statutes contiguity of the new territory to the city is to be determined, and that the judgment should be affirmed.

The undisputed...

Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases