The contention that respondent lacked authority to resort to disciplinary action against the petitioner licensee for the misconduct on January 4, 1960 because of the cancellation of the license on December 31, 1959, which was stayed by the order of Mr. Justice BELDOCK, though ingenious, is specious. The cases cited do not support the contention.
It is apparent, however, that the measure of punishment or penalty consisting of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.