1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 9 Wis.2d
  5. 9 Wis.2d 60 (1960)
 

KEMMERER v. ROSCHER

9 Wis.2d 60 (1960)

KEMMERER and another, Appellants, v. ROSCHER, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

January 5, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Muriel Prazak of Clinton, and Geffs, Geffs, Block & Geffs of Janesville, and oral argument by Mr. Jacob Geffs and Miss Prazak.

For the respondent there was a brief by Godfrey, Godfrey & Neshek of Elkhorn, and oral argument by Thomas G. Godfrey.

BROWN, J.

Defendant contends that the "exclusive listing" contract is completely void and no recovery can be had upon it.

Upon these facts, if plaintiffs are barred from recovery upon this exclusive listing contract it must be as a result of statutes restricting the activities and the rights which, as brokers, they would otherwise have. Statutes pertinent to the cause are:

"136.02 BROKERS AND SALESMEN LICENSED. No person shall engage in or follow the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases