FILSNO v. CITY OF ROCHESTER


10 A.D.2d 663 (1960)

Mary Filsno, Appellant, v. City of Rochester, Respondent, et al., Defendants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

February 4, 1960


Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Memorandum:

The complaint was dismissed at the close of plaintiff's case apparently upon the ground that there had been a failure to prove compliance with an ordinance of defendant city which provided in substance that the city should not be liable and no action might be maintained against it for damages in consequence of any sidewalk...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases