The County Court correctly held that coram nobis may not be had there as to the first and second convictions, since they were had in the Supreme Court. We find that coram nobis does not lie as to the third conviction. The defendant's application as to that is based on the contention that upon the third conviction no multiple offender information was filed against him. If there was such an error, it appears upon the face of the record and consequently coram...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
