COUNTY OF MENDOCINO v. PADULA

Docket No. 9676.

182 Cal.App.2d 470 (1960)

6 Cal. Rptr. 270

COUNTY OF MENDOCINO, Respondent, v. ELMER A. PADULA et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

July 6, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wayne P. Burke for Appellants.

Merle P. Orchard, District Attorney, and Frank S. Peterson, Assistant District Attorney, for Respondent.


PEEK, J.

Defendants own and operate a sawmill and planing mill on somewhat less than four acres of land located on the western bank of Outlet Creek in Mendocino County. Prior to the present proceeding the property was divided by a county road which wound through it at grade level and eventually led to a bridge crossing the creek. Because of frequent washouts it was decided that a new bridge should be built slightly to the south of the one then in existence. This project...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases