Defendant (1) attacks the sufficiency of the indictment, (2) claims error in the charge and (3) finally asserts that a prior conviction which became erroneous as to sentence (when a conviction preceding that was vacated) in some way vitiates his latest conviction and sentence as a multiple offender or entitles him to some amelioration thereof. Upon the papers before us on this appeal these contentions appear groundless. In any event, each supposed defect appears upon the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
