1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 11 Wis.2d
  5. 11 Wis.2d 471 (1960)
 

RUDE v. ALGIERS

11 Wis.2d 471 (1960)

RUDE, Respondent, v. ALGIERS and another, Appellants. McCOURT, Respondent, v. SAME, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 1, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Hale, Skemp, Hanson, Schnurrer & Skemp of La Crosse, and oral argument by Quincy H. Hale.

For the respondents there was a brief by Petersen, Sutherland, Axley & Brynelson of Madison, for Twila Rude, and Hilbert W. Dahms of Oconomowoc, for Dorothy I. McCourt, and oral argument by Mr. F. A. Brynelson and Mr. Dahms.

CURRIE, J.

The defendants raise the following issues before this court:

(1) Is Algiers entitled to the benefit of the emergency rule as a matter of law, in view of the jury's failure to find that he was negligent with respect to position on the highway, thus requiring that the jury's finding that he was causally negligent with respect to management and control be set aside?

(2) Do certain rulings of the trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases