1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 193 F.Supp.
  5. 193 F.Supp. 251 (1960)
 

UNITED STATES v. ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA

Civ. No. 8030.

193 F.Supp. 251 (1960)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff v. ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA and Rome Cable Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court N.D. New York.

November 17, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Theodore F. Bowes, U. S. Atty., Syracuse, N. Y., Samuel Karp, Edna Lingreen, Michael H. Gottesman, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., of counsel, for the United States.

Bergson & Borkland, Washington D. C., Herbert A. Bergson, Washington, D. C., of counsel, for Aluminum Co. of America.

Ferris, Hughes, Dorrance & Groben, Utica, N. Y., Robert Groben, Utica, N. Y., of counsel, for Rome Cable Corp.

BRENNAN, Chief Judge.

This is an anti-trust litigation to test the legality of the merger of the two corporate defendants.

By reason of a prior motion, D.C., 193 F.Supp. 249, and stipulation, the defendants were required to produce certain documents pursuant to the provisions of Rule 34, F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A. The defendant, Aluminum Company of America, hereinafter referred...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases