1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 55 Wn.2d
  5. 55 Wn.2d 385 (1960)
 

DIMOFF v. ERNIE MAJER, INC.

No. 35179.

55 Wn.2d 385 (1960)

347 P.2d 1056

PETE DIMOFF et al., Appellants, v. ERNIE MAJER, INC., et al., Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One.

January 7, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tonkoff, Holst & Hopp and Samuel W. Fancher, for appellants.

Paine, Lowe, Coffin & Herman, for respondent Ernie Majer, Inc.

Witherspoon, Kelley, Davenport & Toole (E. Glenn Harmon, of counsel), for respondent Ford Motor Co.

OTT, J.

October 9, 1956, Ernie Majer, Inc., repossessed a Ford truck it had previously sold on contract to Pete Dimoff and Lewis Raikoglo on or about May 18, 1956. The purchase agreement contained, inter alia, the following:

"Manufacturer's Warranty is shown on back of this order. It is agreed that there are no other warranties, either expressed or implied covering said car. (2) This order is not binding on dealer until accepted by dealer in writing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases