SCHULTZ v. STEINBERG

Docket No. 24281.

182 Cal.App.2d 134 (1960)

5 Cal. Rptr. 890

HARRY SCHULTZ, Appellant, v. H. STEINBERG et al., Defendants; NATHAN ADLER et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

June 23, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marshall H. Sevin for Appellant.

D. Brandon Bernstein for Respondents.


RICHARDS, J. pro tem.*

In an action for compensatory and punitive damages for fraud in the inducement of a sale of a coin-operated self-service laundry to the plaintiff, judgment was for defendants. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment, from an order dismissing the action as to one defendant which is embodied in the judgment, and from the order denying plaintiff's motion for a new trial.

An order denying a motion for new trial is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases