1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 59 N.J.
  5. 59 N.J. Super. 110 (1960)
 

TROAST v. LASCARI

59 N.J. Super. 110 (1960)

157 A.2d 346

PETER R. TROAST, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ANTHONY LASCARI, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 11, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Joseph V. Cullum argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Mr. Joseph P. Palladino, attorney).

Mr. John P. Holly argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Messrs. Mendez & Ruckert, attorneys).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, CONFORD and FREUND.

The opinion of the court was delivered by FREUND, J.A.D.

Plaintiff Peter R. Troast instituted this action to recover the reasonable value of engineering and surveying services which he rendered at the request of defendant Anthony Lascari. Plaintiff valued his services at $1,650. Defendant denied having engaged the plaintiff for any purpose other than the making of one survey and three plot plans. The issues thus posed for trial before the Bergen County Court, Law...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases