James R. HOFFA, Petitioner,
v.
Honorable F. Dickinson LETTS, Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, et al., Respondents,
Edwin D. Dorsey et al. and Harry Bath et al., Intervenors.
John F. ENGLISH et al., International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Petitioners,
v.
Honorable F. Dickinson LETTS, Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, et al., Respondents,
Edward D. Dorsey et al. and Harry Bath et al., Intervenors.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued April 22, 1960.
Decided July 21, 1960.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Mr. Jacob Kossman, Philadelphia, Pa., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Mr. H. Clifford Allder, Washington, D. C., was on the pleadings, for petitioner in No. 15676.
Mr. David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., with whom Messrs. Edward Bennett Williams and Raymond W. Bergan, Washington, D. C., were on the pleadings, for petitioners in No. 15679.
Mr. Carl W. Belcher, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U. S. Atty., and Harry T. Alexander and Arnold T. Aikens, Asst. U. S. Attys., were on the pleadings, for respondent Honorable F. Dickinson Letts.
Mr. Herbert J. Miller, Jr., Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Raymond G. Larroca and Howard P. Willens, Washington, D. C., were on the pleadings, for Board of Monitors.
Mr. Eugene F. Mullin, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. J. Parker Connor, Washington, D. C., was on the pleadings, for respondent Smith.
Mr. Mozart G. Ratner, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Warren Woods, Washington, D. C., was on the pleadings, for intervenors Dorsey and others, and Bath and others
Before EDGERTON, WILBUR K. MILLER and FAHY, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
FAHY, Circuit Judge.
On June 14, 1960, we held in English v. Cunningham, No. 15704, 108 U.S.App. D.C. 359, 282 F.2d 842, that an order of the District Court denying a motion to prevent a hearing on the Interim Report of the Monitors of September 14, 1959,1 was not the denial of an injunction appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1292 or otherwise appealable. By previous orders of May 17, 1960 we had dismissed...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
