STRINGFELLOW v. STRINGFELLOW

No. 34787.

56 Wn.2d 957 (1960)

350 P.2d 1003

353 P.2d 671

WILMA E. STRINGFELLOW, Respondent, v. VIRGIL O. STRINGFELLOW, Appellant.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

April 7, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Floyd M. Reischling and Max R. Nicolai, for appellant.

Riddell, Riddell & Williams, for respondent.


FOSTER, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant husband from a decree of divorce.

The parties, married in 1929, have accumulated a fortune and have one son now aged twenty-two.

The trial consumed four weeks and one day, and the statement of facts contains slightly in excess of twenty-five hundred pages, one hundred sixty-seven pages of which is argument addressed to the trial court. The charges and countercharges are sordid, indeed. No professional enlightenment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases