1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 10 A.D.2d
  5. 10 A.D.2d 996 (1960)
 

MATTER OF LICITRA v. POWER

10 A.D.2d 996 (1960)

In the Matter of Joseph Licitra, Respondent, v. James M. Power et al., Constituting The Board of Elections of the City of New York, et al., Respondents, and Irving Mosberg, Individually and as Candidate for Public Office of Member of Senate, Sixth Senate District, County of Queens, et al., Appellants In the Matter of Joseph J. Kunzeman, Respondent, v. James M. Power et al., Constituting The Board of Elections of the City of New York, et al., Respondents, and Jack E. Bronston, Individually and as Candidate for Public Office of Member of Senate, Fifth Senate District, County of Queens, et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

May 26, 1960

Orders reversed on the law, without costs, and applications denied, the findings of fact are affirmed.

Respondents Kunzeman and Licitra are the respective nominees of the Republican party for State Senate, 5th and 6th Senatorial Districts, Queens County. Special Term has found their grievances to be identical, and has written a full memorandum in the Licitra case only, and decided the Kunzeman case on the same basis. We need, therefore, speak only of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases