LAYCOCK v. KENNEY

No. 16170.

270 F.2d 580 (1959)

Gladys LAYCOCK, Appellant, v. Frank J. KENNEY, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied October 21, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Seitz, Easley & Whipple, Norman L. Easley, Portland, Or., Paul Bakewell, Jr., St. Louis, Mo., for appellant.

C. E. Luckey, U. S. Atty., Robert R. Carney, Asst. U. S. Atty., Portland, Or., for appellee.

Francis T. Cornish, Berkeley, Cal., amicus curiæ.

Before HAMLEY, HAMLIN and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges.


JERTBERG, Circuit Judge.

Appellant is the owner of the majority interest in gold mining property situated in Grant County, Oregon, which she alleges has been extensively developed to a point where 234,000 tons of ore are blocked out. She further alleges that she has found, as many other gold mine operators in the United States have found, that the ore cannot be economically mined and processed at the current price set for gold under the regulations of the United States...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases