LOCAL LODGE NO. 1424, INT. ASS'N OF MACHINISTS v. N. L. R. B.

Nos. 14257, 14324.

264 F.2d 575 (1959)

LOCAL LODGE NO. 1424, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS, AFL-CIO; and International Association of Machinists, AFL-CIO, Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. BRYAN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided February 27, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Bernard Dunau, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Plato E. Papps, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for petitioners in No. 14257.

Mr. Frederick U. Reel, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Jerome D. Fenton, General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Thomas J. Dermott, Associate General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, and William W. Watson, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, were on the brief, for respondent in No. 14257 and petitioner in No. 14324.

Mr. Frank L. Gallucci, Highland Park, Mich., with whom Mr. Abraham Dobkin was on the brief, for respondent in No. 14324. Mr. Plato E. Papps, Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for respondent in No. 14324.

Before PRETTYMAN, Chief Judge, and FAHY and BURGER, Circuit Judges.


BURGER, Circuit Judge.

The Bryan Manufacturing Company (respondent in 14324), which then employed about 150 persons in its Reading, Michigan, plant, received a letter in July 1954 from the International Association of Machinists advising that the Machinists represented "a majority of the `production and maintenance' employees of your company." The Machinists sought a collective bargaining agreement.

In the proceedings from which this appeal arises it was found...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases