HICKS v. LADY

No. 5-1833.

323 S.W.2d 429 (1959)

Frank HICKS, Appellant, v. R. S. LADY et ux., Appellees.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

April 27, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cecil C. Matthews, Stuttgart, for appellant.

Milton G. Robinson, Stuttgart, for appellee.


McFADDIN, Justice.

The Trial Court refused to grant appellant a new trial on his claim that the jury was guilty of misconduct; and here is appellant's wording of his assignment of error: "Trial court should have sustained Appellant's motion for mistrial and new trial for reason that jurors received additional evidence from some of their members which was highly prejudicial to the Appellant and which tended to the discredit of Appellant's testimony."

The background...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases