ACHOR, C.J.
Appellant was convicted of embezzlement. A similar charge had been filed against an accomplice who in this action testified as a witness for the state. One of the errors asserted as grounds for new trial and here argued as cause for reversal is the refusal of the trial court to permit the accomplice to testify on cross-examination upon any subject regarding the case pending against him.
Specifically the appellant's counsel asked about the
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
