BEMBINSTER v. AERO AUTO PARTS


7 Wis.2d 54 (1959)

BEMBINSTER, Respondent, v. AERO AUTO PARTS, INC., Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 7, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Gorman & Gorman of Wausau, and oral argument by David A. Gorman.

For the respondent there was a brief by Schmitt & Wurster of Merrill, and oral argument by C. B. Wurster.


BROADFOOT, J.

The defendant first contends that the place where the accident occurred was not a part of the defendant's place of employment. The point of accident clearly was on the private crossing over the track of the railway company. The defendant contends that the fact it may have been allowed by the railway company to construct the crossing over its right of way for the convenience of defendant's employees and frequenters did not make the main-line track a part...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases