1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 219 Md.
  5. 219 Md. 353 (1959)
 

LITMAN v. HOLTZMAN

[No. 168, September Term, 1958.]

219 Md. 353 (1959)

149 A.2d 385

LITMAN ET AL. v. HOLTZMAN ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided March 18, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence I. Weisman, with whom was J. Francis Ford on the brief, for the appellants.

Albert L. Sklar and Theodore S. Miller, with whom were Sklar & Sullivan on the brief, for the appellees.

The cause was argued before HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ., and DIGGES, J., Associate Judge of the Seventh Judicial Circuit, specially assigned.

HAMMOND, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

An accountant, selected as a disinterested umpire, determined that a construction company was due some $15,000 by a couple for whom it had partially built a home. At the suit of the couple, the chancellor set aside the award, primarily, it would seem, because of his conviction that the parties should have selected an architect rather than an accountant to act as umpire.

Mr. and Mrs. Samuel Holtzman agreed to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases