SANTAMARIA v. THE SS OTHEM

No. 30, Docket 25602.

272 F.2d 280 (1959)

Angelo SANTAMARIA, Libelant-Appellant, v. THE SS OTHEM, Fearnley & Egger, Inc., R. Myrsten & Rederi, A/B/Volo, Respondents-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided December 1, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Di Costanzo & Klonsky, Brooklyn, N. Y. (Robert Klonsky, Brooklyn, N. Y., on the brief), for libelant-appellant.

Haight, Gardner, Poor & Havens, New York City (William P. Kain, Jr., Thomas F. Molanphy, New York City, of counsel), for respondents-appellees.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and HINCKS and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

Libelant is a longshoreman who sustained injuries while engaged in unloading operations aboard respondent vessel. After presentation of evidence by both parties the court below entered a decree for respondent, holding that libelant's injuries did not result from any unseaworthy condition of the ship. The opinion is reported at D.C.E.D.N.Y. 1959, 170 F.Supp. 866.

Although libelant urges a different factual setting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases