1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 268 F.2d
  5. 268 F.2d 233 (1959)
 

PHINNEY v. TUBOSCOPE COMPANY

No. 17376.

268 F.2d 233 (1959)

Robert L. PHINNEY, Appellant, v. TUBOSCOPE COMPANY, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied July 24, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George W. Beatty, Melva M. Graney, Lee A. Jackson, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Russell B. Wine, U. S. Atty., John E. Banks, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., for appellant.

C. W. Wellen, M. S. McCorquodale, Charles W. Hall, Houston, Tex., Fulbright, Crooker, Freeman, Bates & Jaworski, Houston, Tex., for appellee.

Before CAMERON, BROWN and WISDOM, Circuit Judges.

JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge.

We here deal with problems arising under the Korean Excess Profits Tax Statute, as to which others have said, and we have echoed, that this statute "* * probably represented the most intricate and baffling enactment ever to receive Congressional approval." Burford-Toothaker Tractor Co. v. United States, 5 Cir., 1959, 262 F.2d 891.

As we struggle through this intricate web of definitions, exclusions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases