EXPRESS, INC., v. BOWERS

No. 35869.

169 Ohio St. 227 (1959)

VICTORY EXPRESS, INC., APPELLEE, v. BOWERS, TAX COMMR., APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 13, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. George, Greek, King & McMahon, Mr. Walter E. Shaeffer and Messrs. Beigel & Mahrt, for appellee.

Mr. Mark McElroy, attorney general, Mr. John M. Tobin and Mr. John R. Barrett, for appellant.


Per Curiam.

It is clear from the record that in March 1957 there was a "sale," within the meaning of Section 5739.01, Revised Code, of the motor equipment in question and a transfer of title thereto to appellee, at which time appellee was not a certificated operator authorized to engage in public utility service but did intend to so engage as soon as it was authorized. It is the purposed use of the equipment by the consumer or user that is determinative of the question of tax exception. The fact that Schaefer individually used the equipment in public utility service for a time after the sale does not deprive it of its excepted status. It was at no time used for any purpose or in any manner other than in public utility service, and it was never the purpose of the consumer to otherwise use it.

The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed. See State, ex rel. Paul Stutler, Inc., v. Yacobucci, Clerk, ante, 20.

Decision affirmed.

WEYGANDT, C. J. ZIMMERMAN, TAFT, MATTHIAS, BELL and HERBERT, JJ., concur.

PECK, J., not participating.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases