BISHOP AND BABCOCK MFG. CO. v. FEDDERS-QUIGAN CORP.

No. 53, Docket 25087.

270 F.2d 102 (1959)

BISHOP AND BABCOCK MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDDERS-QUIGAN CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided August 28, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur H. Boettcher, Chicago, Ill. (Brown, Jackson, Boettcher & Dienner and Henry H. Babcock, Chicago, Ill., Donald Malcolm, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant.

Edwin J. Balluff, Detroit, Mich. (Weisman, Celler, Allen, Spett & Sheinberg, and Arthur Sheinberg, New York City, Balluff & McKinley, Detroit, Mich., on the brief), for defendant-appellee.

Before HINCKS, LUMBARD and MOORE, Circuit Judges.


HINCKS, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff brought suit in the District Court for the Western District of New York, claiming that the defendant had infringed its patent, Getz No. 2,594,008. By answer and counterclaim for declaratory judgment, the defendant asserted noninfringement and invalidity. After a trial Judge Morgan, in an unreported memorandum-decision, held the patent invalid; he was also of the opinion that, if the issue were reached, the defendant's structure...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases