THOUROT v. HARTNETT


56 N.J. Super. 306 (1959)

152 A.2d 858

HARRY J. THOUROT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BERNARD M. HARTNETT AND MURRAY GREIMAN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 8, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Isadore Glauberman argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Mr. Sheldon A. Weiss on the brief).

Mr. Joseph A. Davis argued the cause for defendants-respondents (Messrs. O'Mara, Schuman, Davis & Lynch, attorneys; Mr. John M. Walsh on the brief).

Before Judges PRICE, GAULKIN and SULLIVAN.


PER CURIAM.

In this action Thourot sues Hartnett, and Greiman his attorney, for libel, alleging that certain allegations contained in a complaint drawn by Greiman and filed in a previous action instituted by Hartnett against Thourot, were defamatory. Hartnett and Greiman moved for summary judgment on the ground that these allegations were privileged. The motion was granted, and Thourot appeals.

Section 587 of the Restatement of the Law of Torts<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases