PUHL v. MILWAUKEE AUTOMOBILE INS. CO.


8 Wis.2d 343 (1959)

PUHL and others, Plaintiffs, v. MILWAUKEE AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY and others, Defendants. [Appeal and cross appeals.]

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 3, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiffs there was a brief and oral argument by N. Paley Phillips, attorney, and Bertram J. Hoffman of counsel, both of Milwaukee.

For the defendants there were briefs by McCue & Regan, attorneys, and D. J. Regan of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by D. J. Regan.


HALLOWS, J.

Joseph Fetzer and his insurer contend the trial court erred in refusing to hold that Fetzer as a matter of law was not causally negligent as to management and control and lookout. Fetzer contends that he did all he could to avoid the collision.

There was credible evidence to sustain the jury finding that Fetzer was causally negligent as to lookout and management and control. Fetzer was driving south on Highway

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases