1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 8 Wis.2d
  5. 8 Wis.2d 24 (1959)
 

MEIER v. MEURER

8 Wis.2d 24 (1959)

MEIER and wife, Respondents, v. MEURER and others, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

October 6, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief and oral argument by Woodrow J. Bach of Milwaukee, for the Meurers, and Carlton Roffa of Milwaukee, for Samuel J. Ansfield, and Arnold J. Ansfield of Milwaukee of counsel.

For the respondents there was a brief and oral argument by John W. Emmerling of Milwaukee.

FAIRCHILD, J.

It is clear from the complaint that the publications complained of are true in large part. Plaintiffs assert, however, that the handbill and advertisement are capable of a meaning which is false and actionable, and that it is for the jury to decide whether the false and actionable meaning was conveyed to the readers.

Admittedly, there are several omissions or inaccuracies. The publications do not state who "ordered" the sale. They give the impression...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases